Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Joseph Aruanno v. Merrill Main, et al
as 10-1252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant - Appellee:
MERRILL MAIN, Director of Psychology, CYNTHIA SWEENY, Administrator, GRACE ROGERS, Administrator and others
DAVIDSON v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2009cv06424
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, RALPH WOODWARD, BERNARD GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIDSON v. LOURY et al
as 2:2009cv05810
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
DERECK LOURY, GEORGE HAYMAN, RALPH WOODWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTS v. GOODWIN
as 2:2009cv04985
Petitioner:
RODNEY ROBERTS
Respondent:
BERNARD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREENFIELD v. CORZINE et al
as 2:2009cv04983
Plaintiff:
GILBERT THOMAS GREENFIELD, JR.
Defendant:
JON CORZINE, ANN MILGRAM, GEORGE HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. GOODWIN
as 2:2009cv03156
Petitioner:
RODNEY ROBERTS
Respondent:
BERNARD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
R.W. v. Bernard Goodwin
as 09-2814
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R.W.
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD GOODWIN, Administrator, Specil Treatment Unit
ASHBRIDGE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2009cv03147
Petitioner:
KENNETH ASHBRIDGE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANN MILGRAM and BERNARD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Hasher v. Bernard Goodwin
as 09-2551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HASHER
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD GOODWIN
GIBBS v. GOODWIN et al
as 1:2009cv01046
Petitioner:
RICHARD GIBBS
Respondent:
BERNARD GOODWIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
