Cases 11 - 20 of 25
LADER v. BROWNSTEIN et al
as 2:2016cv04493
Plaintiff:
RACHEL K. LADER
Defendant:
MARC A. BROWNSTEIN , AMY L. BROWNSTEIN , MOLLY R. BROWNSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04011
Plaintiff:
YONG CHUL SON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SEPTA TRANSPORTATION IN THE GREATER PHILADELPHIA, PA, JACK M. BERNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWNSTEIN v. HORIZON EYE CARE, P.A.
as 1:2016cv04122
Plaintiff:
DONNA BROWNSTEIN
Defendant:
HORIZON EYE CARE, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Peter Brownstein v. Tina Lindsay, et al
as 12-4471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER BROWNSTEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
TINA LINDSAY and ETHNIC TECHNOLOGIES
Peter Brownstein, et al v. Tina Lindsay, et al
as 12-2506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER BROWNSTEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHNIC TECHNOLOGIES and TINA LINDSAY
Great Western Mining & Mineral v. ADR Options Inc., et al
as 12-1685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREAT WESTERN MINING & MINERAL COMPANY and BENJAMIN C. WEINER
Defendant - Appellee:
ADR OPTIONS INC., BROWNSTEIN AND VITALE and BROWNSTEIN VITALE & WEISS
BROWNSTEIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59376
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BROWNSTEIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Great Western Mining & Mineral v. ADR Options Inc., et al
as 10-3142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREAT WESTERN MINING & MINERAL COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ADR OPTIONS INC., BROWNSTEIN VITALE & WEISS, P.C. and BROWNSTEIN AND VITALE, P.C.
BROWNSTEIN v. LINDSAY et al
as 3:2010cv01581
Plaintiff:
PETER BROWNSTEIN
Defendant:
TINA LINDSAY and ETHNIC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BROWNSTEIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv05012
Plaintiff:
NAOMI BROWNSTEIN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
