Cases 11 - 20 of 6,982
BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05829
Petitioner:
LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stansbury v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Zachary Molsak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv05339
Plaintiff:
GERARD BRADLEY
Defendant:
POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC., FLEMINGTON POWER SPORTS, POLARIS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BLANEY et al v. YOUSSEF et al
as 2:2024cv05120
Plaintiff:
MARY BLANEY and MAROSE REALTY CORP
Defendant:
DOHA YOUSSEF, VALLEY BANK, ANTHONY BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRADLEY v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05126
Petitioner:
LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. NuStar Energy L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Ryan Smith
Defendant:
NuStar Energy L.P., Bradley Barron, J. Dan Bates and others
DAVIS v. WAWA
as 2:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAVIS
Defendant:
WAWA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P. v. ADAMS et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P.
Defendant:
J. MICHAEL ADAMS, JR., Richard W. Bloomingdale, AMY BRADLEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
