Cases 11 - 20 of 78
AUDREY YEUNG v. AMAZON.COM, INC et al
as 1:2020cv15579
Plaintiff:
WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o AUDREY YEUNG and AUDREY YOUNG
Defendant:
AMAZON .COM, INC, ABC CORP (1-20) and AMAZON.COM INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
INGRAM v. SUPERINTENDENT et al
as 2:2020cv01517
Petitioner:
QUENTIN INGRAM
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02634
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131
SUN v. 500.COM LIMITED et al
as 2:2020cv00485
Defendant:
ZHENGMING PAN, QIANG YUAN and 500.COM LIMITED
Plaintiff:
FENGJUN SUN
Petitioner:
BRIAN ZHANG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv19985
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RAMIREZ v. SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS et al
as 5:2019cv01295
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, COM OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
GENESIS MATOS RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CIBC Bank USA v. ISI Security Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018mc00215
Defendant:
ISI Detention Contracting Group, Inc., Metroplex Commercial Fire and Security Alarms, Inc., ISI Detention Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
CIBC Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
ELANSARI v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv01123
Petitioner:
Amro A Elansari
Respondent:
Com. of Pennsylvania and The Attorney General of the State of ______
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELANSARI v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv02161
Petitioner:
AMRO ELANSARI
Respondent:
COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _____________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
