Cases 11 - 20 of 28
BANKS v. DICTORATE et al
as 2:2013cv01712
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DICTORATE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, BEHAVIORAL PSYCHOTHERAPY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAPPER v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2013cv01629
Petitioner:
MATTHEW P. CLAPPER
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Dictorate et al
as 4:2013cv02599
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Dictorate, Central Intellegence Agency, Behavorial Psychotherapy Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. QUAKER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2013cv01329
Plaintiff:
SHINIC DAVIS
Defendant:
QUAKER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT , BARBARA MELLETT , HEIDI ONDEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAPPER v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv01688
Plaintiff:
ERICA LYNN CLAPPER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Alfonso Pew v. C Garman, et al
as 12-3748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant - Appellee:
C GARMAN, Unit Manager, KOHLER, Lt., SUNDERLAND, Captain and others
Pew v. Garman et al
as 3:2012cv01579
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
C. Garman, Lt. Kohler, Sunderland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALLORY v. CITY OF ALTOONA et al
as 3:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. MALLORY
Defendant:
CITY OF ALTOONA , JANICE FREEHLING , JACK E. KUHN, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 1:2012cv00496
Defendant:
Timothy F. Geithner, Nancy D. Hogan, Bureau of Labor Statistics and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maginley v. Phillips et al
as 3:2011cv00864
Plaintiff:
Julie M. Maginley
Defendant:
Brien Michael Phillips, Robert E. Schaefer , Harmony Creek Pub, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
