Cases 11 - 20 of 50
MCGRAW v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv05987
Plaintiff:
LEO ALI MCGRAW
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and DENNIS E. LEBO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. REINAKER et al
as 5:2015cv05106
Plaintiff:
WILLIE MACK YOUNG
Defendant:
DENNIS E. REINAKER, RICHARD SIMMS, RICHARD GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CITIBANK, N.A. v. MONSEN et al
as 2:2015cv04312
Plaintiff:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Defendant:
ERIC R. MONSEN, FIVAR LEASING, L.L.C., ERIC MONSEN 1991 TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2014cv01990
Plaintiff:
DENNIS E. MILLER, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Norman Robertson, et al v. Larry Bartels, et al
as 12-3083
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NORMAN ROBERTSON, JOHN COIRO, EUGENE KULICK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY BARTELS, RICHARD CODEY, SONIA DELGADO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SEC OF STATE NJ and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
LYNCH v. VALAZ et al
as 5:2012cv03201
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. LYNCH
Defendant:
MICHELLE VALAZ, THE EAST LAMPETER POLICE DEPARTMENT, DENNIS E. REINECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARMAN et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as 3:2012cv01020
Plaintiff:
ROSE ANN C. GARMAN and DENNIS E. GARMAN
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FANT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv41697
Plaintiff:
DENNIS E. FANT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RUMBLE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv40118
Plaintiff:
DENNIS E. RUMBLE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Kershner v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00733
Plaintiff:
Dennis E Kershner
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
