Cases 11 - 20 of 174
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MOTYA v. JONES
as 2:2022cv02051
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED MOTYA
Defendant:
DONNELL GREGORY JONES
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
SHAW v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
DONNELLE SHAW
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, UNITED NATIONS and BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS et al v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
REGINA LEWIS, MAXINE LEWIS and DONNELL CHADWICK
Defendant:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ROBINSON v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2021cv03661
Petitioner:
DONNELLE ROBINSON
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON et al v. SANTOS
as 5:2021cv02269
Plaintiff:
GENETTE M. ALSTON and DONNELL L. JACKSON
Defendant:
ROBERTO M. SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06923
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ATTERBURY v. EARN COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv00623
Defendant:
CASEY OLIVERA, NAKIA RATTRAY, DONNELL MORRIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA ATTERBURY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organizations Act
Leaks, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Paul DeSando, Jeff Troutman, Mike Nelligan, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Leaks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
