Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv01968
Plaintiff:
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Chen Hsing Hsu and Panion & BF Biotech, Inc.
Defendant:
Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04241
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SHELTON v. ARETE FINANCIAL GROUP et al
as 2:2018cv02187
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant:
ARETE FINANCIAL GROUP , SHUNMIN HSU and PHU LOC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
LIU et al v. CHENG DU 23 INC et al
as 2:2017cv12867
Plaintiff:
YI CHING LIU , JI YUAN LIN , TECK KIM EU and others
Defendant:
CHENG DU 23 INC, FU RESTAURANT LLC, YONGYI JIANG and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HSU v. RAY et al
as 3:2017cv02329
Plaintiff:
GISELLE HSU
Defendant:
JOSEPH RAY, BRYANT MEYERS, TODD GIESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ, JR v. IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv08420
Plaintiff:
TED NUNEZ, JR
Defendant:
IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., FRED WILKINSON, BRYAN M. REASONS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Duoline Technologies LP v. Polymer Instrumentation and Co, et al
as 16-3575
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DUOLINE TECHNOLOGIES LP
Defendant - Appellant:
POLYMER INSTRUMENTATION AND CONSULTING SERVICES, Ltd., TDBA Polymics, Ltd. and TIM HSU, Doctor
Marsha Scherer v. Keh-Shew Lu, et al
as 14-4005
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARSHA SCHERER, derivatively on behalf Diodes Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
KEH-SHEW LU, RAYMOND SOONG, C. H. CHEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3738
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00538
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
