Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Veeva Systems Inc. v. IQVIA Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv18558
Defendant:
IMS SOFTWARE SERVICES, LTD. and IQVIA INC.
Plaintiff:
Veeva Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
IM Wilson Inc v. Grishko Dance SRO, et al
as 19-2953
Defendant / Appellant:
NICOLAI GRISHKO, GRISHKO DANCE SRO and OBCHTCHESTVO S OGRANITCHENNOY OTVETSTVENNOSTYOU, "Grichko"
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IM WILSON INC
VERDU v. IM
as 3:2019cv16394
Plaintiff:
SERGIO VERDU
Defendant:
YEOHEE IM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IQVIA INC. et al v. VEEVA SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2019cv15516
Defendant:
VEEVA SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
IMS SOFTWARE SERVICES, LTD. and IQVIA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
IQVIA INC. et al v. VEEVA SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2019cv15517
Defendant:
VEEVA SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
IMS SOFTWARE SERVICES, LTD. and IQVIA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
COLL v. IM PRACTICES, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv12586
Defendant:
SAURABH AGARWAL, IM PRACTICES, INC. and IM PRACTICES, INC. doing business as JOMSON STAFFING SERVICES & RAVEN LOGISTICS
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. COLL, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PGT TRUCKING, INC. v. TRAXYS NORTH AMERICA LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01356
Plaintiff:
PGT TRUCKING, INC.
Defendant:
TRAXYS NORTH AMERICA LLC and IM/EX TRANSPORTATION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH et al v. CAP IM Supply, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00591
Plaintiff:
Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH, Bayer Healthcare LLC and Bayer Animal Health GmbH
Defendant:
CAP IM Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
EMAMI v. QUINTELES IMS et al
as 2:2017cv03069
Plaintiff:
ARASH EMAMI
Defendant:
QUINTELES IMS , EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFITS PLAN , JOHN DOE (1-100) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
