Cases 11 - 20 of 29
KELLY et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2016cv02171
Plaintiff:
JAMES KELLY and LEANNE KELLY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: James Kelly
as 16-1791
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES KELLY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
USA v. James Kelly, Jr.
as 13-3475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES KELLY, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ALSTON-KELLY et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv02458
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA ALSTON-KELLY and JAMES KELLY, JR.,
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-20 (Fictitious Names), JANE DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KELLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv01721
Petitioner:
JAMES KELLY, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
KELLY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv60021
Plaintiff:
JAMES KELLY
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY , CBS CORPORATION , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP and others
Consol_defendant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLY v. KEYSTONE DIGITAL IMAGING, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07244
Plaintiff:
JAMES KELLY
Defendant:
KEYSTONE DIGITAL IMAGING, INC., KEYSTONE DIGITAL IMAGING INCORPORATED, DOUG MCOMFSA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roquet v. Kelly et al
as 4:2011cv01763
Plaintiff:
Cheri Roquet
Defendant:
James Kelly, III, Tammie L. Kelly, Harry Mathias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KELLY et al v. JIM WALTER CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv63349
Plaintiff:
JAMES KELLY and VALERIE KELLY
Defendant:
JIM WALTER CORP., CAREY CANADA, INC. and CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
