Cases 11 - 20 of 21
In re: Kenneth Lewis, et al
as 17-2581
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
JAMES LEWIS, DARILYNN KNAUSS, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT B. KUGLER
In re: Kenneth Lewi
as 17-1694
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant - Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, JUDGE JAMES E. SHADID and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT B. KUGLAR
LEWIS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2017cv00330
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
JAMES LEWIS, DARILYNN KNAUSS, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. YOST
as 3:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN YOST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DABNEY et al v. WAGNER et al
as 1:2012cv01371
Plaintiff:
MYRTLE DABNEY and SIDNEY DABNEY
Defendant:
JAMES LEWIS WAGNER, JR. , JOHN DOE and MARY DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION v. LEWIS
as 2:2011cv01747
Plaintiff:
HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION
Defendant:
JAMES LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. James Moore
as 09-3060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES LEWIS MOORE
BRADDOCK v. FIBREBOARD CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv74284
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS BRADDOCK
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., JOHN CRANE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEWIS et al v. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv73935
Plaintiff:
YVONNE LEWIS, GINA LEWIS and JAMES LEWIS
Defendant:
BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEWIS et al v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv73630
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS and LENA LEWIS
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
