Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3248
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
NELSON v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv06308
Petitioner: JARRETT NELSON
Respondent: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sebagh v. Paucek et al
as 1:2022cv01205
Plaintiff: Daniel Sebagh
Defendant: Christopher J. Paucek, Mark J. Chernis, Harsha Mokkarala and others
Nominal Defendant: 2U, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2527
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
MCCRAY v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv05010
Plaintiff: IYIESHA MCCRAY
Defendant: WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., WALTER JARRETT JACOB, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jones v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00967
Plaintiff: Brian Jones
Defendant: Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Waterman v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff: Marc Waterman
Defendant: Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Whitfield v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00973
Plaintiff: Matthew Whitefield and Matthew Whitfield
Defendant: Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
HARLEY v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02732
Plaintiff: MARY HARLEY
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, VETERANS MEDICAL (CLINIC) CENTER, ALL NURSES ON THE 7TH FL. 7 WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?