Cases 11 - 20 of 29
PURISIMA v. REVEL ENTERTAINMENT et al
as 1:2013cv02772
Plaintiff:
ANTON PURISIMA
Defendant:
REVEL ENTERTAINMENT, SARFINO PELLEGRINO, M. W. GORANSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demetrius Bailey v. Melissa McMahon, et al
as 13-2117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA MCMAHON, T. GIMBENSKI, DORINA VARNER and others
Kathleen Roberts, et al v. Upper Darby Township, et al
as 12-4604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHLEEN ROBERTS and M. W.
Defendant - Appellee:
UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL CHITWOOD, GEORGE RHOADES and others
THE COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. W.
as 2:2011cv04824
Plaintiff:
THE COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant:
M. W.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
William Victor, et al v. R. Lawler, et al
as 11-2750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Defendant - Appellee:
R. M. LAWLER, M. W. HARLOW, DORINA VARNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2151
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BROWN v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2011cv02001
Petitioner:
ROSCOE BROWN, JR.
Respondent:
M. W. HARLOW , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 11-1229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 10-4434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
M William Capital Inc. et al v. Pacific Cycle Inc.
as 1:2010cv00703
Plaintiff:
M William Capital Inc. , M W Capital LLC , Meredith Birrittella and others
Defendant:
Pacific Cycle Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
