Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
DIFERDINAND v. POTTSTOWN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2011cv05759
Plaintiff: GARY DIFERDINAND, SR.
Defendant: POTTSTOWN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and POTTSTOWN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Shawn Martin Finch v. Conemaugh Memorial Medical Cen
as 10-2263
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHAWN MARTIN FINCH
Defendant - Appellee: CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
FINCH VS. CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
as 3:2009cv00329
Plaintiff: SHAWN MARTIN FINCH
Defendant: CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
NIAGARA FALLS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER v. IMMUCOR, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04010
Plaintiff: NIAGARA FALLS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant: IMMUCOR, INC., IMMUCOR, INC., ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Type: Other Statutes None
NIAGARA FALLS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER v. IMMUCOR, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02476
Plaintiff: NIAGARA FALLS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant: IMMUCOR, INC., ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00054
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
KAUFFMAN v. FRANZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv05043
Plaintiff: AARON KAUFFMAN
Defendant: PAMELA FRANZ, STEPHEN SPENCER, POTTSTOWN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03233
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?