Cases 11 - 20 of 22
LOMBARDO v. BURNS et al
as 5:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
BRIAN BURNS, JENNIFER EDWARDS, RAUL PINTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOTTSHALL-WRIGHT et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2021cv18954
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN GOTTSHALL-WRIGHT, MELANI BORODZIUK, MATTHEWS JILL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PHILIP MURPHY, HON STUART J. RABNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FREDERICK v. MURPHY
as 2:2021cv18482
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FREDERICK
Defendant:
PHILIP MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAUL v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2021cv13063
Defendant:
PHILIP MURPHY, GURBIR GREWAL, CHRISTOPHER J CHRISTIE and others
Plaintiff:
MD RICHARD ARJUN KAUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LABAAR v. MURPHY
as 3:2021cv12199
Plaintiff:
FREDERIK LABAAR
Defendant:
PHILIP MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2021cv10393
Plaintiff:
HEATHER ANDERSON
Defendant:
Philip Murphy, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New Jersey, GURBIR S GREWAL, ELIZABETH MAHER MUIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2020cv11472
Defendant:
PHILIP MURPHY, GURBIR GREWAL, JARED MAPLES and others
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY et al v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2020cv05228
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY and ALEXANDER ROUBIAN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY CORONAVIRUS TASK FORCE, NEW JERSEY PRESS ASSOCIATION, GOVERNOR PHILIP MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BEHAR v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2020cv05206
Defendant:
PATRICK J. CALLAHAN and PHILIP MURPHY
Plaintiff:
DAVID BEHAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JM et al v. ELNAHAL et al
as 2:2018cv17303
Defendant:
TERESA MCQUAIDE, SWANG OO, TOMIKA CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
JM, SC, PT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
