Cases 11 - 20 of 22
USA v. Romel Bolger
as 12-4123
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROMEL BOLGER, aka DAMIR MILLER, aka ROMEZ BOLGER, aka CHARLES CONNOR, aka BH, aka BIG HOMMIE, aka JAMES MCCARTY
BAUMAN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04576
Plaintiff:
LEDDURE RASHAD BAUMAN , VERONICA BAUMAN , JOHN W. BEASLEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COACH, INC. et al v. ROMEL COSMETICS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03704
Plaintiff:
COACH, INC. and COACH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
ROMEL COSMETICS, INC. and ADRIENNE RUTH RESNICK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
FELIX v. OFFICE DIRECTOR, HUDSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2011cv03401
Petitioner:
ROMEL FELIX
Respondent:
OFFICE DIRECTOR, HUDSON COUNTY JAIL, JOHN TSOUKARIS, ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WARD v. MC GOWAN
as 2:2009cv00756
Plaintiff:
ROMELLE ADAMS WARD
Defendant:
JOSEPH MC GOWAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
WARD v. MCGOWAN
as 1:2009cv00699
Plaintiff:
ROMELLE ADAMS WARD
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCGOWAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86702
Plaintiff:
ROMEL WILLIAMS and ROMEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLIAMS v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79095
Plaintiff:
ROMEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
USA v. Romel Bolger
as 08-2294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROMEL BOLGER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
