Cases 11 - 20 of 34
BYNUM v. GORSKY et al
as 3:2019cv18874
Defendant:
TARA GLASGOW, MICHAEL E SNEED, RONALD A. WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIRSCHFELD v. BECKERLE et al
as 3:2018cv14796
Defendant:
CHARLES PRINCE, ANNE M MULCAHY, WILLIAM D PEREZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARC HIRSCHFELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIRSCHFELD v. BECKERLE et al
as 3:2018cv14796
Defendant:
CHARLES PRINCE, ANNE M MULCAHY, WILLIAM D PEREZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARC HIRSCHFELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
RONALD HERMAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CASTELLANO et al v. J&L EXPEDITED FREIGHT et al
as 1:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
TEODORE I. CASTELLANO and RUFUS ADEKUNLE-WRIGHT
Defendant:
J&L EXPEDITED FREIGHT and RONALD LEE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
RONALD LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ronald Williams v. Wayne Gavin, et al
as 15-1144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE GAVIN, Superintendent, LT. HORVATH, Sone Lieut., C.O. DANIEL DREVENEK and others
Ronald Williams v. Joseph Nish, et al
as 15-1143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH P. NISH, Former Superintendent, KAREN ROGERS-SWEENEY, Program Coordinator, WAYNE GAVIN, Superintendent and others
Raimondi v. Wyoming County et al
as 3:2014cv01918
Plaintiff:
Debra Raimondi
Defendant:
Wyoming County , Thomas S. Henry , Judy Kraft Mead and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Williams v. Gavins et al
as 1:2013cv00387
Plaintiff:
Ronald C Williams
Defendant:
Wayne J Gavins, Horvath, Dresnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
