Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
USA v. Ronald Smith
as 14-2104
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RONALD SMITH
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv01595
Plaintiff: RONALD SMITH
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv01745
Plaintiff: Ronald Smith
Defendant: United States of America , Ronnie Holt , Angela P. Dunbar and others
Mediator: Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BREEDEN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv06080
Plaintiff: LOUIS BREEDEN , RICHARD L. BRAHAM, JR. , CONNIE J. BRAHAM and others
Defendant: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Janet Evans v. NY & NJ Port Authority
as 10-3829
Plaintiff - Appellant: JANET L. EVANS and ROBERT A. COPLIN
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANNETTE BARRY-SMITH, ROCHELLE JOYNER, RONALD SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: NY & NJ PORT AUTHORITY, its employees, agents, and/or servants
USA v. Thysone Smith
as 10-1683
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: THYSONE RONALD SMITH, AKA Tighty
SMITH v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76847
Plaintiff: RONALD SMITH
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
USA v. Ronald Smith
as 09-2925
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RONALD SMITH
SMITH v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86372
Defendant: 3M, D.B. RILEY, INC., JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff: RONALD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv01355
Petitioner: RONALD SMITH
Respondent: GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?