Cases 11 - 20 of 621
Ricardo Fernandes-Gomes, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1392
Petitioner:
RICARDO FERNANDES-GOMES, JESSICA CARDOSO PEREIRA-FERNANDES and H. A. C-F.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BURGOS RESTO v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS, JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO, HECTOR TOLENTINO and others
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELL PATH, DR. IBRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JALIL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY G. et al
as 2:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JALIL
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY G., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, AVDEL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAVERAS v. REYES
as 3:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
RICARDO TAVERAS
Defendant:
MARIA ELENA REYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Devengoechea v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
as 1:2023mc00609
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Devengoechea
Defendant:
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Ricardo Ayala v. Syncreon. US, Inc.
as 2:2023cv04561
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ayala, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and Ricardo Ayala
Defendant:
Syncreon. US, Inc. and SYNCREON TECHNOLOGY (USA), LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01917
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Townsend v. Rickard
as 1:2023cv01887
Petitioner:
Ricardo Townsend
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
