Cases 11 - 20 of 1,135
Aerotek, Inc. v. River Run Foods Inc
as 4:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Aerotek, Inc.
Defendant:
River Run Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Banks v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Marvin Banks, Running River, Dale Arnold and others
Defendant:
Superintendent Bradley Booher, Head Chaplain Henry Hansard, Tracy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinshaw v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Jason Dewight Hinshaw
Defendant:
Keri L. Moore, John Rivello, John Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Salt River Associates v. Pitts et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Salt River Associates
Defendant:
William Pitts and Lonnie Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. WATERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05171
Plaintiff:
ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
WATERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC, 38 COAH LLC, NORTH RIVER MEWS ASSOCIATES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
