Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Royster v. Mooney et al
as 3:2018cv01069
Petitioner:
Michael Royster
Respondent:
Mooney and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Royster v. Glunt et al
as 3:2017cv01149
Plaintiff:
Michael Royster
Defendant:
Glunt, William T. Williams, Burk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Telly Royster v. Corizon, et al
as 16-3787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TELLY ROYSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, PETER BINNION, MD, THEODOOR VOORSTAD, MD and others
Florence-Elizabeth Mason v. Giovanni Campbell, et al
as 16-3322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLORENCE-ELIZABETH MASON
Defendant - Appellee:
GIOVANNI O. CAMPBELL, J.C.C.P. in his Individual and Official Capacity, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHRISTOPHER BOLTINGHOUSE, In his Individual and Official Capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, in its Individual and Official Capacity
MASON v. CAMPBELL et al
as 2:2016cv01675
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE MASON
Defendant:
GIOVANNI CAMPBELL , COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , CHRISTOPHER BOLTINGHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROYSTER v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2015cv01023
Plaintiff:
JACK ROYSTER
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROYSTER v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv04369
Plaintiff:
RODNEY ROYSTER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PAYNE v. ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv02813
Plaintiff:
STEVEN PAYNE
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JENKINS et al v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2013cv05181
Plaintiff:
SHARON MARIE JENKINS
Defendant:
ROBERT DUFFY, ELAINE DUFFY, CONSTANCE PRINCIPAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
