Cases 11 - 20 of 4,571
QUINN et al v. CHAVEZ et al
as 2:2024cv03290
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and OFFICER LUIS CHAVEZ
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE QUINN and MICHAEL QUINN, SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WOOD et al
as 2:2024cv03263
Plaintiff:
JEROME WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TYREEK WOOD, STEFAN WOOD, JR. and STEFAN WOOD, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEBB v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
JEREMY WEBB, SR
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lilley v. Martinez et al
as 1:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Arielle May Lilley
Defendant:
Corinne Reid, Roberto Pino and Ivan Martinez, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Allam, Sr. v. Sutton et al
as 1:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Allam, Sr.
Defendant:
F. Sutton and Laurel R. Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. SHAPIRO et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Defendant:
UNIFIED ERIE BLUE CODES PROGRAM, AUDREY KNIGHT, BRADON DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00861
Defendant:
Ronald S. Holloway, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLAUSER v. THE PA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2024cv00134
Respondent:
THE PA ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FOREST and THE PA PAROLE BOARD
Petitioner:
JASON A. BLAUSER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bitler v. ROBESON TOWNSHIP
as 5:2024cv02177
Defendant:
ROBESON TOWNSHIP
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bitler, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
