Cases 11 - 20 of 22
BAUM-BRUNNER v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2020cv00800
Defendant:
JUSTINE MCDANIEL, PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER/CEO, CHRISTOPHER KOPECKI and others
Plaintiff:
BAUM-BRUNNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Winters v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 19-1016
Defendant:
COURIER POST, TERRY KING, CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WINTERS
WINTERS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2017cv03530
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WINTERS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKER v. PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS et al
as 2:2016cv00634
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS , PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER , PHILLY.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS et al
as 2:2015cv05267
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS, MENSAH M. DEAN, H.F. GERRY LENFEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. RIKER et al
as 2:2015cv03388
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DEREK RIKER, SETH WILLIAMS, ELLEN T. GREENLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLOFF v. CHRISTIE
as 3:2015cv01432
Plaintiff:
DEBORA L. ROLOFF
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE, GLENN GRANT, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv01441
Plaintiff:
PETER DIPIETRO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE, GLENN GRANT, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Philadelphia Inquirer et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv01917
Plaintiff:
The Philadelphia Inquirer and The Patriot-News
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel , Marirosa Lamas and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAMBERS v. PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER et al
as 2:2011cv06589
Plaintiff:
JERRY ARMOND CHAMBERS, SR.
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS and SOUTH PHILLY REVIEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
