Cases 11 - 20 of 16,953
Francielica Da Silva, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1893
Petitioner:
FRANCIELICA GESSICA DA SILVA, JOAO ROSA PEREIRA-DA SILVA, A. P.-D. S. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
VILLANOVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv01170
Defendant:
GHOST TOURS PHILADELPHIA, LLC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
DEAN VILLANOVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
HOLLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06156
Petitioner:
CARL LEE HOLLOWAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Abdush Dubose, et al v. Attorney General United States of America, et al
as 24-1815
Plaintiff:
ABDUSH DUBOSE, ZUMAR DUBOSE and KARIEM BASEER DUBOSE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv04048
Plaintiff:
AYONNA BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LYFT, INC., MICHAEL RADO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
STOKES v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv06037
Petitioner:
BRAD STOKES
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06027
Plaintiff:
PRABHJOT SINGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
