Cases 11 - 20 of 21
MCCONNELL v. HENRY
as 2:2009mc00018
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PRICE MCCONNELL
Respondent:
MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: Local Question
PRICE v. ORCHID CELLMARK, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv00246
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PRICE
Defendant:
ORCHID CELLMARK, INC., MARGARET A. TERRILL, CHARLOTTE J. WORD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRICE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2008cv68242
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PRICE
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PRICE v. NOLASCO
as 2:2007cv04345
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WILLIAMS PRICE
Defendant:
JOHNNY NOLASCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PRICE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL TOM CORBETT
as 2:2007cv04231
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WILLIAMS PRICE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PRICE v. VARRICCHIO
as 2:2007cv04105
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WILLIAMS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHELE VARRICCHIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PRICE v. VARRICCHIO
as 2:2007cv03932
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WILLIAMS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHELE VARRICCHIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRICE v. NOLASCO
as 2:2007cv03894
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WILLIAMS PRICE
Defendant:
JOHNNY NOLASCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
PRICE v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DRUG & ALCOHOL PROGRAM
as 2:2007cv03933
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WILLIAMS PRICE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DRUG & ALCOHOL PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PRICE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 2:2007cv03873
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WILLIAMS PRICE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
