Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Brownlee v. Monroe County Correctional Facility
as 1:2018cv01318
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Brownlee, III
Defendant:
Monroe County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWNLEE et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv02950
Plaintiff:
WALLACE BROWNLEE and TERESA BROWNLEE
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA PLC, ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jonathan Brownlee
as 17-3705
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN BROWNLEE
BROWNLEE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10661
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. BROWNLEE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhode et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv07910
Plaintiff:
JERIE RHODE , JOYCE ARCIUOLO , MOLLIE ARNDT and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWNLEE v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2017cv01172
Petitioner:
ROBERT BROWNLEE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI FAYETTE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. HOLY HARVEST CHRISTIAN TRUST et al
as 2:2017cv01093
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
HOLY HARVEST CHRISTIAN TRUST and GEORGE KONSTANTAKIS
Cross_defendant:
BROWNLEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. STRAWN et al
as 2:2017cv00048
Petitioner:
MARK A. JOHNSON
Respondent:
EDWARD STRAWN, TIM P. GILBERT, JON RIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv09212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
