Cases 21 - 30 of 150
OLSEN v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2022cv00868
Plaintiff:
JUDITH OLSEN
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEVAULT v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DEVAULT
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, OSCAR AVILES and EVELYN OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATERMAN v. CYRUSONE INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CYRUSONE INC., LYNN A WENTWORTH, ALEX SHUMATE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
WILSON v. CYRUSONE INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
JORDAN WILSON
Defendant:
CYRUSONE INC., ALEX SHUMATE, DAVID H FERDMAN and others
COFFMAN v. CYRUSONE INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE COFFMAN
Defendant:
CYRUSONE INC., ALEX SHUMATE, DAVID H FERDMAN and others
GANT v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv17766
Plaintiff:
RONALD HOWARD GANT, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, DR. NEAL JONES and EVELYN OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIN v. HUSSAR et al
as 2:2021cv00511
Plaintiff:
MARY LEWIN
Defendant:
BENJAMIN OLSEN, JEFFREY HUSSAR and DARION FEIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLSEN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv08076
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE OLSEN
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATERMAN v. RIGNET, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01160
Defendant:
KEITH OLSEN, ROYAL ACQUISITION SUB, INC., STEVEN E PICKETT and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Wheeler v. Rignet, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00341
Defendant:
Kevin J. O'Hara, James H. Browning, Ditlef De Vibe and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
