Cases 21 - 30 of 1,385
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
JSK HOSPITALITY, LLC v. CARNEYS POINT HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04709
Plaintiff:
JSK HOSPITALITY, LLC
Defendant:
Carney's Point Hospitality, LLC, Shailesh Shah, TODD BEAMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PATEL v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv04646
Plaintiff:
MD SUJA PATEL
Defendant:
CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and NATIONAL IAM BENEFIT TRUST FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
PATEL v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv04669
Plaintiff:
THE EXCELLENT RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES and PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
PATEL v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01472
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES and THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Patel v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel and Raj Patel
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., XXVI Holdings, Inc., Google LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Raj Patel v. United Parcel Services
as 24-1542
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
THOMAS v. MILFORD HOSPITALITY LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01266
Plaintiff:
MARK THOMAS
Defendant:
MILFORD HOSPITALITY LLC and ANIL PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
