Cases 21 - 30 of 47
BEGLEY v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2014cv05247
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BEGLEY
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BEGLEY v. MITCHELL
as 1:2013cv05341
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BEGLEY
Defendant:
CHARLES E. MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meeks et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03652
Plaintiff:
CHIEF ROBERT MOORE, John Nunan, Patricia Shadoan and others
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
In Re:
PLAVIX PRODUCT LIABILITY AND MARKETING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BEGLEY v. MITCHELL
as 2:2013cv02047
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BEGLEY
Defendant:
CHARLES E. MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
BEGLEY v. NCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BEGLEY
Defendant:
NCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Patricia Begley v. Bristol Myers Squibb
as 13-1406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA BEGLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, SANOFI-AVENTIS US INC, SANOFI-SYNTHELABO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BEGLEY v. PENN CREDIT CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv05517
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BEGLEY
Defendant:
PENN CREDIT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
STANTON V. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, ET AL
as 2:2011cv05358
Plaintiff:
SAM STANTON
Defendant:
THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY , CHRISTOPHER WARD, MARY LEE HANNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
