Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AYALA v. CROPPER et al
as 1:2013cv03777
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO AYALA
Defendant:
LAWRENCE CROPPER , DART TRANSIT and JOHN DOE I-III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2826
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ECORE INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. DOWNEY et al
as 5:2012cv02729
Plaintiff:
ECORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
PAUL DOWNEY , PLITEQ, INC. and DART ADVANTAGE WAREHOUSING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SPENCER GIFTS LLC v. R.M. SULLIVAN TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv02125
Plaintiff:
SPENCER GIFTS LLC
Defendant:
R.M. SULLIVAN TRANSPORTATION, INC. and DART TRANSIT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bridgeforth v. Dart First State Division of Deldot et al
as 1:2010cv00583
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Bridgeforth
Defendant:
Dart First State Division of Deldot, Delaware Department of Transportation, J. Kirchner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. NY Pol Dept, et al
as 10-1892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMERSON TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
NY POL DEPT, STEVEN, New York Police Detective, THOMAS, New York Police Det. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
