Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
BACH et al v. MCGINTY et al
as 3:2012cv05853
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BACH and CAROL BACH
Defendant:
JOHN MCGINTY and JOHN DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-9
as 5:2012cv04818
Plaintiff:
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
THIRD DEGREE FILMS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-9
as 3:2012cv03894
Plaintiff:
THIRD DEGREE FILMS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC. et al v. JOHN DOES 1-9
as 1:2012cv03030
Plaintiff:
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-9
Movant:
JOHN DOE 4
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
BACH et al v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2012cv02518
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BACH , CAROL BACH and KEY NORTH, LLC
Defendant:
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY , GLOBAL MARINE INSURANCE AGENCY INC. , JOHN DOES 1-9 and others
Cross_claimant:
GLOBAL MARINE INSURANCE AGENCY INC.
Cross_defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS 1-9, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NUCORP, LTD. v. JOHN DOES 1-9
as 5:2012cv02086
Plaintiff:
NUCORP, LTD.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
RINGGOLD v. KELLER et al
as 2:2011cv00974
Plaintiff:
TREVOR RINGGOLD
Defendant:
MATTHEW KELLER, BRIAN COLEMAN and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MULLER v. CLARKS LANDING AT DELRAN, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv02447
Plaintiff:
AARON P. MULLER
Defendant:
CLARKS LANDING AT DELRAN, INC., CLARKS LANDING BOAT SALES & MARINA, CLARKS LANDING MARINA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
PATRICK COLLINS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-9
as 2:2011cv01513
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
