Cases 21 - 30 of 158
Buford v. Watts et al
as 3:2014cv01573
Plaintiff:
George Willie Buford
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, The Northeast Regional Counsel, USP Lewisburg Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willie Davis v. Warden Lewisburg USP, et al
as 14-3429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP, HARRELL WATTS and J.E. THOMAS
Barrett v. Norwood et al
as 1:2014cv01326
Plaintiff:
Marc Erick Barrett
Defendant:
J. Norwood, Robert Womeldorf, Bergon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shanklin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00973
Plaintiff:
Frank Shanklin
Defendant:
Harrell Watts , Jeff Allen , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur D'Amario, III v. Barry Weiner, et al
as 14-1928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR D'AMARIO, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CUSPO BARRY J. WEINER, in his personal capacity, KATHLEEN HOPKINS, TERRANCE DONNELLY and others
Davis v. Norwood et al
as 3:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Davis
Defendant:
Joseph L. Norwood, Harrell Watts and J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Bittenbender et al
as 1:2013cv02660
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, J.L. Norwood, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STAPLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2013cv02377
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States Of America, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Parks v. Andrew Edinger, et al
as 13-3247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW EDINGER, Medical Doctor, KEVIN PIGOS, Medical Director Doctor, FRANCIS FASCIANA, Mid Level Practitioner and others
Parks v. Edinger et al
as 1:2013cv01834
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Defendant:
Andrew Edinger, Kevin Pigos, Francis Fasciana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
