Cases 21 - 30 of 266
Carl BellIn re: Carl Bell
as 23-2828
Petitioner:
In re: CARL EDWARD BELL
Respondent:
KIM ARDERY, Medical Care Suoervisor/CHCA at SCI-Benner Township, MORRIS HOUSER, Superintendent, GEORGE LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Corrections and others
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKELVIE v. HOUSER
as 2:2023cv03733
Petitioner:
DARRELL MCKELVIE
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Houser et al
as 1:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Edwards
Defendant:
Warden M. Houser, Lt. Redfern, U.M. Potts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tunsil v. Laurel et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Defendant:
Harry Laurel, WellPath, Inc, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Federal Aviation Administration
as 1:2023mc00383
Petitioner:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, City of Warwick Retirement System, William C. Houser and others
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration
Damien ClagonIn re: Damien Clagon
as 23-2461
Petitioner:
In re: DAMIEN D. CLAGON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT MORRIS HOUSER, @SCI BENNER TOWNSHIP, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, , PA and ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mokshefski v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Michael Mokshefski
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Todd Haskins, Prime Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
