Cases 21 - 30 of 67
GLOVER v. OWENS et al
as 1:2021cv20714
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANTHONY GLOVER
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv13805
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROWN
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID S. OWEN, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv13212
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR, C.F.G. MEDICAL ENTERPRISE and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L. FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNEIL v. TAYLOR
as 1:2021cv03721
Petitioner:
RAYMOND A. MCNEIL
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. MCBRIDE et al
as 1:2020cv17578
Defendant:
DOUGLAS GRUNDLOCK, JILL MAYERS, REGINALD ADKINS and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD LEE DAVIS and REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAIG v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2020cv11053
Plaintiff:
CRAIG GARARD HILL
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNEY v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv19310
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BARNEY, JR
Defendant:
KAREN TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3322
Not Yet Classified:
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY, MICHELLE VERNO, Judge, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
In re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3323
Not Yet Classified:
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY, MICHELLE VERNO, Judge, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
