Cases 21 - 30 of 148
CAMPBELL v. CITY OF LOGAN TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2020cv00151
Defendant:
JUSTIN HOLLERN, TYLER MCCONNELL, NICOLE GRIPP and others
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUTZ v. NORTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv00829
Defendant:
DONALD J. COKUS, JR., NORTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP, DETECTIVE DONALD J. COKUS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. LUTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LUTZ v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 2:2020cv00676
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LUTZ
Defendant:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
LUTZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv01175
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
KELLY LUTZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUTZ v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00134
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
BETTY LUTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOORS et al v. LUTZ
as 1:2019cv19144
Plaintiff:
LENORE KOORS, MARIANNE WEBER, PATRICIA WEBER and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH F. LUTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2019cv19128
Defendant:
THOMAS LUTZ, JOHN DOE 1-10 and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUTZ v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04599
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LUTZ
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lutz-Stoker v. Saul
as 1:2019cv01601
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Megan Lutz-Stoker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
