Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Francisco Matos-Almonte v. Attorney General United States
as 21-3036
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ALBERTO MATOS-ALMONTE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TAYLOR v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2021cv19445
Plaintiff:
RALPH TAYLOR
Defendant:
Asst. Admin. ALFARO ORTIZ, ESSEX COUNTY, ESSEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTIONS CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2021cv15045
Plaintiff:
LAMONT VAUGHN
Defendant:
LT. TAYLOR, SGT. MATOS, DOCTOR MICHAEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZELAYA v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2021cv14956
Plaintiff:
RAMON ZELAYA
Defendant:
DIRECTOR ALFARO ORTIZ, SGT. MATOS, SGT. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matos-Ramirez v. Northampton County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv02976
Plaintiff:
Genesis Matos-Ramirez
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL and St. Luke's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATOS v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC et al
as 5:2021cv02751
Defendant:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE t/a PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE BERKS COUNTY, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC and DOE DESIGNEES 1 and 2
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA MATOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATOS v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC et al
as 2:2021cv02751
Defendant:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE t/a PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE BERKS COUNTY, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC and DOE DESIGNEES 1 and 2
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA MATOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matos-Ramirez v. Northampton County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv01026
Defendant:
St. Luke's Hospital and Northampton County Jail
Plaintiff:
Genesis Matos-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Valentin et al v. Wysock et al
as 1:2021cv00399
Defendant:
New Castle County, Patricia Wysock, Michael Wysock and others
Plaintiff:
Claribel Valentin and Emilio Matos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
