Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Mecca & Sons Trucking Corp v. White Arrow LLC, et al
as 16-3864
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MECCA & SONS TRUCKING CORP
Defendant - Appellant:
WHITE ARROW LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
TRADER JOES CO
MECCA v. SPEEDWAY LLC
as 1:2016cv07364
Plaintiff:
MARC MECCA
Defendant:
SPEEDWAY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adamitis v. Borough of Dickson City et al
as 3:2016cv00497
Plaintiff:
Anthony Adamitis
Defendant:
Borough of Dickson City , Michael Fedorka , Robert Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MECCA & SONS TRUCKING CORP. v. WHITE ARROW, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv07915
Plaintiff:
MECCA & SONS TRUCKING CORP.
Defendant:
WHITE ARROW, LLC , ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RINCHER v. MECCA & SON TRUCKING CO., INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05381
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RINCHER
Defendant:
MECCA & SON TRUCKING CO., INC. and JERRY MECCA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mecca v. Black et al
as 3:2013cv01121
Plaintiff:
Shawna Mecca
Defendant:
Joseph Black, Murray, Robert McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MECCA et al v. LEVINE et al
as 2:2013cv02158
Plaintiff:
JO-ANNE MECCA and PETER MECCA
Defendant:
HARLAN BRETT LEVINE, M.D., HARTZBAND JOINT REPLACEMENT INSTITUTE, HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Martin v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2012cv01507
Plaintiff:
Jacob Martin
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Lackawanna County Treatment Court, Lackawanna County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
