Cases 21 - 30 of 652
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04349
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
GONZALEZ v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2009cv03994
Petitioner:
ISRAEL A. CENTENO GONZALEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MICHAEL CHERTOFF, THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03881
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01248
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Sassower v. Sisk, et al
as 09-2797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE SASSOWER
Defendant - Appellee:
P. DOUGLAS SISK, SALLY MRVOS, CLAPP & EISENBERG and others
THERTULIEN v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2009cv02717
Petitioner:
ROBERTO THERTULIEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, HQCDU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROLAND v. MUKASY et al
as 2:2009cv02591
Petitioner:
BEAUVOIR JEAN ROLAND
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, THE HQCDU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00721
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00611
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PIERRE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2009cv01169
Petitioner:
NORKENS PIERRE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, HQCDU and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
