Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv13295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MEYERS v. POSTMASTER GENERAL OF U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2021cv08723
Defendant:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, MS. KRUSE and CHIEF OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION UNIT
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn Harris v. Postmaster General of the US
as 21-1589
Defendant / Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE and GLENN HAROLD HARRIS
Dennis Campbell, et al v. Postmaster General of the US
as 21-1211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL and DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv20108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al v. United States Postmaster Gener, et al
as 20-3419
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MAINE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CHAIRMAN POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS, UNITED STATES POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BROWN v. DEJOY
as 1:2020cv12657
Plaintiff:
SADIE BROWN
Defendant:
USPS POSTMASTER GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dorothy Stewart v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 20-2292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOROTHY M. STEWART
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN and POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
