Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 112
BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. AMARA, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01011
Plaintiff: BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant: AMARA, LLC, TUSHAR PATEL, JAYESH PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Franchise
DAVIS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv11843
Plaintiff: ANTOINE RAHIM DAVIS
Defendant: CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. HENDERSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01937
Plaintiff: J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant: RAHIM HENDERSON and ATMOSPHERE BAR & LOUNGE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
USA v. Rahim McIntyre
as 16-4400
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAHIM MCINTYRE, aka King Kobra aka Kobe
WHITNEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv07910
Plaintiff: RAHIM MANSUR WHITNEY
Defendant: CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAXTON v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv04446
Petitioner: RAHIM BRAXTON
Respondent: UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rahim Braxton v. USA
as 16-3161
Petitioner: RAHIM BRAXTON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MCINTYRE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03835
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: RAHIM MCINTYRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PHILLIP v. MCADAMS et al
as 2:2016cv03775
Plaintiff: RAHIM PHILLIP
Defendant: ELIZABETH MCADAMS, KAREN PRECHTEL and DOUGLAS PRECHTEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06993
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?