Cases 21 - 30 of 34
RIPLEY et al v. BRETHREN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2014cv04763
Plaintiff:
CARROLL RIPLEY, JR. and CAROLYN RIPLEY
Defendant:
BRETHREN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Luis Vega v. George Ripley, et al
as 13-3564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS VEGA
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE RIPLEY, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for York City Police Department, CITY OF YORK and YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
RIPLEY v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP
as 3:2012cv01012
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN B. RIPLEY
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vega v. Ripley et al
as 1:2011cv02015
Plaintiff:
Luis Vega
Defendant:
George Ripley , City of York , City of York Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIPLEY et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61750
Plaintiff:
FRANK WINSTON RIPLEY and MINNIE LUCY RIPLEY
Defendant:
A C & S, INC. , CELOTEX CORP , FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIPLEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54774
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. RIPLEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RIPLEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40619
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. RIPLEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RIPLEY et al v. SUNOCO, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01194
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RIPLEY , JAMES P. SAVAGE, JR. , BRADFORD TAKACS and others
Defendant:
SUNOCO, INC. , MICHAEL G. MCKEE and STEPHEN J. KOCZIRKA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
