Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Mr. Ditrolio, U.S. Marshal Cook, Mr. Gaven and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAYNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv02685
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BAYNES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. MARSHALL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. U.S. Marshals Judiciary Security Division et al
as 1:2021cv00890
Respondent:
New York Times, U.S. Department of Justice, Fox News and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KAETZ v. UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS et al
as 2:2021cv00062
Defendant:
UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS, MATTHEW A. HOHMAN, CLAIR CECCHI and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FLY v. UNITED STATES et al.
as 1:2020cv13962
Plaintiff:
Toni Fly, Tony Fly, Toniya Fly and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Joint Prisoner Transport Systems, U.S. Public Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATSON v. HARPER
as 2:2020cv00382
Petitioner:
KEVIN WATSON
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHALLS and ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WATSON v. HARPER
as 2:2020cv01056
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER and U.S. MARSHALLS
Petitioner:
KEVIN WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STONE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv21052
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHAL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
ROGER STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv01428
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2019cv01354
Respondent:
USA, ORLANDO HARPER, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
