Cases 21 - 30 of 81
S.R. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv20733
Plaintiff:
S. R.
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., GILBERTO SEGURA and COOPERS PUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jaswinder Singh v. Uber Technologies Inc
as 21-3234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASWINDER SINGH, on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
PESANO v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES,INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01580
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP PESANO
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES,INC. and ANDREW FARKOSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOSSAIN et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04577
Plaintiff:
FAISAL HOSSAIN and NAYMA KHATUN
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PORTIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MOSER v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04231
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHELIA MOSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
RAMZIDDIN v. CHECKR et al
as 3:2021cv17264
Plaintiff:
ABUSSAMAA RASUL RAMZIDDIN
Defendant:
CHECKR, GRUBHUB, UBER TECHNOLOGIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04146
Plaintiff:
DEKONTEE WILLIAMS and ORGARWAR DOE
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER PA-LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
STERN et al v. RIZZO, JR. et al
as 3:2021cv17072
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER STERN and YONATHAN STERN
Defendant:
FRANCIS J RIZZO, JR., CHAIM BARUCHOV, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv13118
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JOHN MOE(S) (1-10), USHA B. PAREKH and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
