Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Raymond Thornton v. Michael McMahon, et al
as 13-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCMAHON, PERRY PHELPS, G. R. JOHNSON and others
Kaleta v. Clausi et al
as 4:2012cv01987
Plaintiff:
David F. Kaleta
Defendant:
Vinny Clausi , Stephen Bridy and County of Northumberland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thornton v. McMahon et al
as 1:2012cv01171
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Thornton
Defendant:
Michael McMahon, Perry Phelps, G. R. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKBAR et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
as 2:2012cv02606
Plaintiff:
AKMAL HAKIM AKBAR , TERRY T. ALLEN , MIKE BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diggan v. Northumberland County Board of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv00849
Plaintiff:
Allen Diggan
Defendant:
Northumberland County Board of Prisons , Richard Shoch , Vinny Clausi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Pizza Grille, Inc. et al v. Vinny Vegas Pizza & Grill of Lemoyne, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00712
Plaintiff:
The Pizza Grille, Inc. and The Pizza Grille 2, Inc.
Defendant:
Vinny Vegas Pizza & Grill of Lemoyne, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
WIDAMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv04810
Plaintiff:
VINNIE WIDAMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv40358
Plaintiff:
VINNY E. PATE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Best v. County of Northumberland et al
as 4:2011cv00896
Plaintiff:
Kymberley Best
Defendant:
County of Northumberland, Vinny Clausi and Merle Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Northumberland County et al
as 3:2010cv02502
Plaintiff:
James Freeman
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Frank Sawicki, Vinny Clausi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
