Cases 21 - 30 of 82
WALLIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv12176
Plaintiff:
OCEAIN WALLIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISH et al v. WALLY WORLD RENTALS, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06580
Plaintiff:
DOREEN FISH and GEORGE FISH
Defendant:
WALLY WORLD RENTALS, LLC, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5, XYZ PARTNERSHIPS 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGRATH et al v. WALLY PARK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
as 2:2017cv02901
Plaintiff:
KEVIN G. MCGRATH and DEBRA MCGRATH
Defendant:
WALLY PARK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIRKLAND v. WALLY PARK
as 2:2017cv00752
Defendant:
WALLY PARK
Plaintiff:
THERESE KIRKLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damien Mikell v. Louis Folino, et al
as 17-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Fomer Superintendent 2, ROBERT GILMORE, Former Superintendent 1, JEFFREY R. ROGERS, Corrections Classifiation adn Program Manager and others
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00932
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilnick Dorval v. Moe's Fresh Market, et al
as 16-3602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILNICK DORVAL
Defendant - Appellee:
MOE'S FRESH MARKET and WALLIE HAMED
Caldwell v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
Fred T. Caldwell
Defendant:
David Pierce, Matthew Dutton, Robert D. Wallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
David Pepe v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 16-3195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILSON PEPE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, Old Superintendent, WILBERT MATTHEWS, G-Unit Manager, MICHAEL PREVOST, Kitchen Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
