Cases 31 - 40 of 21,679
Arcona v. Camden County Drug Court et al
as 1:2024cv05644
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
Camden County Drug Court, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SOUCY v. KONINKLIJKE N. V. et al
as 2:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
LINDA SOUCY
Defendant:
Koninklijke Philips N. V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDREWS v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.et al
as 2:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
JAIME ANDREWS
Defendant:
Koninklijke Philips N. V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
3 N HOLDING CORPORATION v. LUKOIL NORTH AMERICAN LLC
as 3:2024cv05102
Plaintiff:
3 N HOLDING CORPORATION
Defendant:
LUKOIL NORTH AMERICAN LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
Clark v. PGT Innovations, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
PGT Innovations, Inc., Rodney Hershberger, Sheree Bargabos and others
Philips v. Xos, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
Xos, Inc., Dakota Semler, George N. Mattson and others
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Xos, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
Xos, Inc., Dakota Semler, George N. Mattson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
