Cases 31 - 40 of 252
PARISI v. WIGGINS et al
as 2:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
PIETRO PARISI
Defendant:
LONNIE WIGGINS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER WALKER, MS. G. KLOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLTIONS INC
as 3:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
SHANEL WIGGINS
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Antoine Wiggins
as 22-2831
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTOINE WIGGINS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WIGGINS v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01873
Plaintiff:
SHANITA WIGGINS
Defendant:
MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC, MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY, ABBOTT LABORATORIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Demetrius Bailey, et al v. Jurnak, et al
as 22-1536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD X. SUTTON, GERALD WIGGINS and THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JURNAK, Library Assistant, BERGER, Principal, S. MILLER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WIGGINS v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2022cv00974
Petitioner:
MATTHEW RYAN WIGGINS
Respondent:
J. OLIVER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WIGGINS v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2022cv00074
Petitioner:
MATTHEW RYAN WIGGINS
Respondent:
J. OLIVER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
