Cases 31 - 40 of 5,819
Robert Reed v. Commissioner United States Parole Commission, et al
as 24-1687
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED, a/k/a Robert Andrew Bey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and CHRISTOPHER WHITMER, U.S. Parole Examiner Employee
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Warner v. Desouza et al
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner
Defendant:
Francis A. Desouza, Sam A. Samad, Frances Arnold and others
SCHROEDER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04559
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D SCHROEDER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thomas Dewald v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 24-1580
Petitioner:
THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
LOMBARDO v. ZANELLI et al
as 5:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LOMBARDO
Defendant:
AMY ZANELLI, OFFICER ANDREW YOST, ROBERT L. NICKELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
