Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Davis v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Virginia Davis
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Tom Carrol, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00212
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Wallace
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAPLE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2011cv62595
Plaintiff:
HAROLD CAPLE and MARGARET CAPLE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS, OWENS-ILLINOIS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAPLE et al v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. et al
as 2:2011cv62716
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CAPLE and RAYMARK IND., INC.
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. , BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. , BRINCO MINING LTD. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
TURNER ASBESTOS FIBERS LTD., ASBESTOS CORP. OF AMERICA, FLINTKOTE MINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAPLES v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84271
Plaintiff:
ROGER A. CAPLES
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA v. Frank Caple
as 09-4006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK CAPLE
USA v. Frank Caple
as 09-3678
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK CAPLE
Caple v. Scranton Police Department et al
as 3:2009cv01283
Plaintiff:
Frank Caple
Defendant:
Scranton Police Department and Unknown Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAPLES v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61434
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. CAPLES, RICHARD C. CAPLES, RICHARD C. CAPLES and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
