Cases 31 - 40 of 107
BYRD et al v. AARON'S, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL BYRD and BRIAN BYRD
Defendant:
AARON'S, INC., ASPEN WAY ENTERPRISES, INC. doing business as AARON'S SALES AND LEASING, A FRANCHISEE OF AARON'S INC., DESIGNERWARE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01604
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05965
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv04452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Adrian Guille v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 19-2430
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER PARKER, MRS. ADAMS, OFFICER K. FINN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN GUILLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WHETSTONE v. MALONE BUSSING SERVICES et al
as 2:2019cv00071
Defendant:
TERESA DARDEN, MALONE BUSSING SERVICES and STEVE MALONE
Plaintiff:
LARRY WHETSTONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DARDEN v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv02657
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DARDEN v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv02101
Defendant:
NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH &DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
